PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.22%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 66.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.03%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -0.07%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
70.93%
Well above LSCC's 97.25% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while LSCC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-153.57%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 240.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.00%
AP growth well above LSCC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
60.21%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -221.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
686.67%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -196.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
62.09%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 108.96%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
2.79%
Lower CapEx growth vs. LSCC's 25.57%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while LSCC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-74.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -5.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
51.73%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -39.11%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-200.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 157.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-188.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -75.99%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.86%
Stock issuance far above LSCC's 3.87%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
13.42%
Buyback growth of 13.42% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.