PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
27.21%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -204.38%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.68%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -3.28%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
1300.00%
Deferred tax of 1300.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
579.12%
Well above LSCC's 237.62% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.67%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -27.28%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
718.42%
Growth well above LSCC's 104.80%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-114.77%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 55.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
70.49%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x LSCC's 2.60%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
12.64%
Lower CapEx growth vs. LSCC's 27.59%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -36.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-10.17%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 54.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3150.00%
We have some outflow growth while LSCC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-410.24%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 118.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-55.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -66.25%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-89.89%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.