205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.71%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -5061.34%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-36.15%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -13.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-88.89%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.31%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 129.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.12%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -317.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.60%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 37845.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1215.38%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. LSCC's 71981.79%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-7.05%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 38.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-19.08%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 0.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-1300.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
58.67%
Purchases well above LSCC's 20.21%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
50.15%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -45.08%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
259.57%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -109.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -111.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-33.29%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.