205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.32%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 98.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
32.80%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -7.71%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-1950.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 75.11%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-176.67%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -13.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-600.00%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 122.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -94.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-99.31%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -99.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-54.95%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 31.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-20.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -52.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while LSCC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
54.39%
Purchases well above LSCC's 69.54%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-52.92%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -13.81%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.19%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 1077.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.43%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. LSCC's 102.13%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
53.46%
Buyback growth of 53.46% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.