PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.58%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 48.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.96%
D&A growth well above LSCC's 3.87%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-1014.29%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
167.37%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -58.28%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
204.11%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 1731.49%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.55%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -98.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
980.00%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -75.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
102.70%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -59.72%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
27.04%
Lower CapEx growth vs. LSCC's 64.11%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.03%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 951.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
34.25%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 215.66%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.29%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
0.92%
Buyback growth of 0.92% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.