PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-80.96%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -106.41%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
12.69%
D&A growth well above LSCC's 6.37%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
70.51%
Deferred tax of 70.51% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
171.65%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -69.82%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.16%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -7.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.28%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -978.85%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-5.56%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 190.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.27%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -64.41%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
60.91%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -13.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46066.67%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
133.33%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -87.98%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-969.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -82.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 14700.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
10.02%
Buyback growth of 10.02% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.