PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-84.11%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 60.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-18.09%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -29.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
113.04%
Well above LSCC's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.20%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 596.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.50%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -20.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-108.16%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 485.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-23.53%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -92.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-77.55%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 316.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
44.16%
CapEx growth well above LSCC's 50.06%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.97%
Purchases growth of 83.97% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
287.30%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 222.72%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.52%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 192.05%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.00%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
73.83%
Buyback growth of 73.83% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.