PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1429.41%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 52.71%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.92%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -14.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-6.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -13.34%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
80.61%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 335.55%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
46.79%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -220.79%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-86.74%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -9.81%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
250.00%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. LSCC's 766.60%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-23.08%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -44.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
121.91%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 349.44%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-11.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -109.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
50.96%
Acquisition growth of 50.96% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-55.86%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-19.81%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -90.48%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -107.36%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to LSCC's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
5.56%
Issuance growth of 5.56% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-147.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 98.46%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.