PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
106.92%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -51.31%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.72%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -4.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
1083.33%
Deferred tax of 1083.33% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-2.13%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -7.15%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-68.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -63.56%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-60.34%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -16.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-243.24%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -53.27%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.00%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -60.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-160.00%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 192.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
49.73%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -62.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-370.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -11.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-154.05%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-73.59%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 109.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-769.01%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 127.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.95%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -85.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-0.40%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.