205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.75%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 236.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.62%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -1.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-7.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.52%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 19.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
56.25%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 228.86%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
183.87%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -231.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-62.26%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 11.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.58%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 188.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
255.56%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -329.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
20.02%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 255.11%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-92.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -45.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.01%
Purchases growth of 5.01% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
300.00%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 225.84%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.47%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -2468.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.76%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. LSCC's 40400.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-40.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.