PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.70%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -8.17%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.75%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 6.18%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-285.71%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-4.08%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -19.11%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
148.85%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -159.40%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
84.57%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -290.50%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
9.59%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -125.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
8100.00%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -104.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.52%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -45.26%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-39.93%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -36.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.63%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -23.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-64.00%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 148.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-424.51%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 28.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.00%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 13.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
20.00%
Buyback growth of 20.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.