205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-29.30%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -21.33%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.94%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 6.05%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
121.68%
Deferred tax of 121.68% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
21.28%
SBC growth well above LSCC's 28.49%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-268.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -320.97%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-118.57%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -208.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-73.63%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 86.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-239.39%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 58.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
100.00%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -134.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-58.05%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -93.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.55%
CapEx growth well above LSCC's 23.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-24.54%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 3.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
153.36%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 107.68%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 19766.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
111.50%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 254.08%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.95%
Stock issuance far above LSCC's 38.88%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-28.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -119.80%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.