PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.57%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 2.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.04%
Deferred tax of 113.04% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
75.47%
SBC growth while LSCC is negative at -2.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
173.20%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 370.76%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
121.57%
AR growth well above LSCC's 144.69%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
126.19%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -101.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
260.95%
Growth well above LSCC's 465.18%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-105.88%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 9757.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
80.35%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 58.92%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
30.07%
CapEx growth well above LSCC's 57.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.13%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -7.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
199.82%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -1.73%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-762.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -22.25%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
65.68%
Debt repayment growth of 65.68% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-81.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -76.95%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
0.44%
We have some buyback growth while LSCC is negative at -7.23%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.