205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-50.42%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 207.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
46.90%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -0.51%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-1933.33%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-29.03%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -5.87%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
98.12%
Well above LSCC's 185.42% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
972.73%
AR growth well above LSCC's 482.74%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
822.73%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 880.77%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -21.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-3600.00%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -162.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-14.67%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -31.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
20.73%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -2065.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.61%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 53.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-76.77%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -69.56%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while LSCC is negative at -4888.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
78.76%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -895.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
83.33%
Debt repayment growth of 83.33% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
284.85%
Stock issuance far above LSCC's 143.26%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
33.33%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 62.37%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.