PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
75.78%
Net income growth similar to LSCC's 82.66%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
466.67%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -84.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-221.88%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 1.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
110.78%
Well above LSCC's 168.98% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
111.92%
AR growth well above LSCC's 157.62%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
215.63%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -15.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
3.85%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -9.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
17.28%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. LSCC's 669.23%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-48.98%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -453.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
78.07%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 528.03%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-2.74%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 86.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-257.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 19.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-78.12%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -40.39%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-548.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -135.83%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
13.04%
Debt repayment growth of 13.04% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-7.35%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 70.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.