PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-66.33%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -229.89%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-3.06%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 1.63%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-160.50%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
182.05%
SBC growth while LSCC is negative at -15.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
2892.00%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -16.28%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
2016.67%
AR growth well above LSCC's 108.10%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
145.95%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -2061.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
277.60%
Lower AP growth vs. LSCC's 1219.90%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-43.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -541.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1044.00%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 377.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.73%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -61.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
36.00%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -941.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.46%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -224.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
194.30%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -25.56%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.88%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -1214.05%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
111.11%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. LSCC's 367.55%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.