PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
37.12%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 126.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.26%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -15.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
120.83%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. LSCC's 542.17%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
17.19%
SBC growth well above LSCC's 8.82%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-153.88%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -219.08%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-129.40%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -199.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-37.36%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 106.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-209.91%
Both negative yoy AP, with LSCC at -83.57%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-292.59%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 178.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
99.15%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -61.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-66.82%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -15.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
12.50%
Lower CapEx growth vs. LSCC's 64.01%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.91%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -17.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
9.86%
Below 50% of LSCC's 143.11%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.64%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 22.55%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
241.35%
Stock issuance far above LSCC's 3.75%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-13.17%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 52.75%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.