205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
82.32%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 166.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.24%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -3.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-460.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 374.39%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.08%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -235.26%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-42.86%
AR is negative yoy while LSCC is 15.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-135.09%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -1443.74%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
85.25%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -741.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
9.62%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -30.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-50.00%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -169.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
87.22%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -177.67%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-15.48%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -23.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-248.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 49.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
264.42%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -34.65%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-638.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 163.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
1309.09%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 85.25%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -96.59%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-6.19%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.