PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 75.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.96%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 6.43%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
155.56%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -112.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-5.33%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 2.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
131.94%
Well above LSCC's 254.71% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
81.25%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. LSCC's 239.27%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
70.00%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 224.75%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
52.78%
Lower AP growth vs. LSCC's 160.24%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
261.70%
Growth well above LSCC's 209.07%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
833.33%
Well above LSCC's 521.87%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
70.77%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 1470.08%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-27.84%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 10.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
27.84%
Acquisition growth of 27.84% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
58.49%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -16.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-69.92%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -79.17%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-24.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -265.23%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-168.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -871.37%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1.75%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. LSCC's 2154.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-1.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.