PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.76%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -25.97%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-1.67%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 8.12%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
73.33%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. LSCC's 312.61%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-7.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -0.98%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
242.42%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -110.51%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
1160.00%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -72.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
16.67%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -153.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
176.47%
AP growth well above LSCC's 46.65%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-91.45%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -222.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-390.91%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -168.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
4.17%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -71.38%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
13.71%
Lower CapEx growth vs. LSCC's 33.44%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-13.71%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
5.81%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -118.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
0.15%
Below 50% of LSCC's 844.36%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
35.54%
Growth well above LSCC's 68.01%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
41.98%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 34.19%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -61.49%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.