PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 83.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.08%
D&A growth well above LSCC's 4.01%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-171.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 170.13%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
18.18%
SBC growth well above LSCC's 21.80%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-214.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -584.96%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-146.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -670.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
440.00%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -204.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-1000.00%
Negative yoy AP while LSCC is 8.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-1161.54%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 157.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
117.19%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. LSCC's 441.47%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-61.47%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -76.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
28.04%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -5.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-43.97%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 51.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
14.60%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -53.27%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
148.72%
Growth well above LSCC's 43.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-147.97%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 39.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.45%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. LSCC's 1230.41%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
1.91%
Buyback growth below 50% of LSCC's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.