205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.25%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -1.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.97%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -1.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-54.05%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 21.49%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.28%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 7.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
34.11%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 102.28%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-10.74%
AR is negative yoy while LSCC is 102.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-276.47%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 90.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
49.57%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -217.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
99.28%
Growth well above LSCC's 91.57%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
81.82%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -110.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
67.75%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 629.48%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-3.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -3.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.51%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -80.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
64.84%
Below 50% of LSCC's 190.30%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-302.63%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 29.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
362.95%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 108.98%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-55.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -36.87%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-3.19%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.