PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.94%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -20.09%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.33%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -9.04%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
52.63%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -35.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-19.48%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -5.63%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
165.88%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -903.18%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
125.45%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. LSCC's 4192.73%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
76.67%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -432.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
18.64%
Lower AP growth vs. LSCC's 66.98%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
18200.00%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -263.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
130.00%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -690.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
78.45%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -27.87%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-28.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 19.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
28.75%
Acquisition growth of 28.75% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-69.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -83.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-68.16%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -1.03%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-18.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -335.12%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-147.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -3737.09%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-45.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -51.77%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
9.83%
Buyback growth of 9.83% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.