PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.12%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 63.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.97%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 2.15%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
185.19%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -1201.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-3.23%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 4.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
49.40%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -244.79%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
430.95%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -176.30%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-371.43%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 102.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
162.50%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -129.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-82.87%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 141.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-517.39%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 9.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-8.03%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -94.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-21.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -69.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
21.36%
Acquisition growth of 21.36% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-33.10%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 62.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
15.29%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -51.70%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
68.13%
Growth well above LSCC's 7.46%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-28.20%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 112.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.88%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -43.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-4.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -569.94%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.