PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.48%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -446.08%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.95%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 47.35%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-95.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 315.32%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
30.00%
Less SBC growth vs. LSCC's 72.48%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-265.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 226.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-169.06%
AR is negative yoy while LSCC is 197.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-81.82%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 3396.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-460.00%
Negative yoy AP while LSCC is 43.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-400.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -86.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
96.35%
Well above LSCC's 104.70%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-52.12%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -101.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.60%
Lower CapEx growth vs. LSCC's 15.20%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -3012.07%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
64.25%
Purchases well above LSCC's 76.45%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
29.47%
Below 50% of LSCC's 496.74%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
103.45%
Growth well above LSCC's 32.58%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
132.18%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -8597.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
75.71%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -12.61%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
4.01%
Buyback growth below 50% of LSCC's 38.60%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.