PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.10%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 33.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.69%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 120.89%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-5800.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
7.69%
SBC growth while LSCC is negative at -51.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
46.99%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -95.84%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
74.03%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -68.42%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
31.67%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -104.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
68.52%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -100.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-12.90%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 266.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
471.43%
Well above LSCC's 44.41%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
34.65%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -102513.33%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-1.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -157.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 72.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
39.84%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -96.79%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-11600.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-210.13%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 99.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.27%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 440.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
2.39%
Buyback growth below 50% of LSCC's 100.33%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.