PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.66%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 29.99%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.06%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
12.28%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -234.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-21.43%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 91.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
231.82%
Well above LSCC's 3.73% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-17.50%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -318.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
378.05%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 834.02%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-41.18%
Negative yoy AP while LSCC is 397.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
358.10%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -460.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-23.08%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 18.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
71.83%
Operating cash flow growth similar to LSCC's 66.09%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-11.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 9.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
11.20%
Some acquisitions while LSCC is negative at -471.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
50.05%
Purchases growth of 50.05% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
13.95%
Below 50% of LSCC's 773.57%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-14.78%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 1668.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
323.56%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 670.06%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-200.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-31.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-20.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.