PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.76%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -82.27%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-8.42%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 1.93%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
202.00%
Well above LSCC's 178.32% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-12.12%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -8.75%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
51.38%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -1007.80%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
776.60%
AR growth well above LSCC's 63.04%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-29.82%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 76.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
104.17%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -108.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-85.61%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 47.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1175.00%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 2253.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
1.49%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 56.72%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-17.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -60.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
17.99%
Some acquisitions while LSCC is negative at -13.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-129.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -498.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-55.41%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -98.91%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
56.06%
We have some outflow growth while LSCC is negative at -101.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-273.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -237.55%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-33.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
214.29%
Issuance growth of 214.29% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
20.63%
Buyback growth of 20.63% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.