PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.95%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 56.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-4.60%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -3.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-52.94%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
24.14%
SBC growth while LSCC is negative at -4.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-206.15%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 434.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-131.45%
AR is negative yoy while LSCC is 230.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-242.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -314.12%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-5300.00%
Negative yoy AP while LSCC is 1345.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-479.49%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 207.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
129.30%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -96.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-54.34%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 1123.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.39%
CapEx growth well above LSCC's 15.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
81.02%
Purchases well above LSCC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
105.95%
Below 50% of LSCC's 1700.90%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
94.83%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 891.29%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
184.89%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 87.60%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-38.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -51.37%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-0.48%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.