PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.56%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 29.94%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.81%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -13.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-345.83%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
5.56%
SBC growth while LSCC is negative at -28.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
101.29%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -64.82%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
24.00%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -113.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
37.72%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 38.15%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
137.50%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -66.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
177.03%
Growth well above LSCC's 16.36%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-60.32%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -331.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
63.71%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -58.77%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.42%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 25.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-396.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
34.44%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -0.57%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-4966.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -25.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-88.66%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 43.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.82%
Stock issuance far above LSCC's 97.76%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
16.35%
Buyback growth of 16.35% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.