PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.26%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 10.11%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.07%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 3.56%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-111.86%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 2212.01%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-26.32%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 32.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
4400.00%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -520.95%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-28.95%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -1588.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
195.77%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 249.65%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-76.92%
Both negative yoy AP, with LSCC at -392.49%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
155.26%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -260.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-72.00%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 133.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
32.18%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -239.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.03%
CapEx growth well above LSCC's 16.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-12.03%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
1.51%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -2.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-57.44%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -99.71%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
7.89%
We have some outflow growth while LSCC is negative at -388.95%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-1027.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -457.06%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x LSCC's 65.40%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-20.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -8.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
5.12%
Buyback growth of 5.12% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.