PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.16%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 34.24%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-4.22%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -10.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
66.40%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -92.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-14.29%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -4.71%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
1.48%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 139.45%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
269.39%
AR growth well above LSCC's 38.49%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-73.53%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -77.88%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
555.56%
AP growth well above LSCC's 111.61%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-89.35%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 251.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2485.71%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -75.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-1.84%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 268.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
20.86%
CapEx growth well above LSCC's 21.41%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-20.86%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-36.20%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 82.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
48.54%
Below 50% of LSCC's 17076.47%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
15.71%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 82.45%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-13.60%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 68.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.79%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 11.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
5.00%
Buyback growth below 50% of LSCC's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.