PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.78%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 10.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.32%
Less D&A growth vs. LSCC's 10.06%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
121.43%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -30.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
41.67%
SBC growth while LSCC is negative at -6.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-274.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -147.07%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-140.96%
AR is negative yoy while LSCC is 689.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-394.44%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 1.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-232.20%
Both negative yoy AP, with LSCC at -1813.75%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-996.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -138.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
80.84%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. LSCC's 581.02%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-42.68%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -65.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-15.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -13.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 416.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
43.17%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -1302.65%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
46.41%
Below 50% of LSCC's 95.21%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
126.27%
We have some outflow growth while LSCC is negative at -416.10%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
138.98%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -123.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
75.00%
We repay more while LSCC is negative at -1132.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
1441.67%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -49.25%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-15.79%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.