PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.92%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -79.00%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.17%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -0.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-700.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
10.29%
SBC growth while LSCC is negative at -23.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
17.19%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 72.05%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-94.12%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -161.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-96.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -150.54%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
115.38%
AP growth well above LSCC's 161.31%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
38.49%
Growth well above LSCC's 70.69%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
131.25%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -54.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.35%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -49.78%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-18.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -24.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.27%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
12.95%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -73.68%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-561.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 86.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-103.00%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 19.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-50.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -112.42%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-47.83%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 56.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-18.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.