205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.69%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -230.61%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.30%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. LSCC's 26839.20%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-28.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -14.17%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
140.76%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 1124.18%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
19.70%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. LSCC's 137.85%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
137.50%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 217.90%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
291.67%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -120.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
205.85%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. LSCC's 821.07%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-110.00%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -22.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
87.79%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 529.57%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-23.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -39.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
23.18%
Acquisition growth of 23.18% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-7.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.27%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 65.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-32.87%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 1185.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-6000.00%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 126.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to LSCC's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-9.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -70.84%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.