PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-73.23%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 83.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.44%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -18.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
8050.00%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -100.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-16.67%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 29.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
601.24%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -119.64%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
382.08%
AR growth well above LSCC's 205.14%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-225.64%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -391.69%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
48.94%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -30.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
346.96%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -263.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2900.00%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -794.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
12.02%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -88.58%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-24.19%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 69.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
24.19%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. LSCC's 6160.61%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-19.05%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-14.13%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 20.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-25.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -372.23%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-84.02%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 68.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.16%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. LSCC's 405.37%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-8.62%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.