PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
297.09%
Net income growth above 1.5x LSCC's 17.48%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
2.23%
D&A growth well above LSCC's 0.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-119.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 125.97%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
55.56%
SBC growth well above LSCC's 47.37%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-141.72%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -197.09%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-158.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -137.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-97.96%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 197.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-172.86%
Negative yoy AP while LSCC is 127.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-118.17%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 77.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-282.14%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 122.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-42.35%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -11.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
18.18%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -40.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -8.20%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
31.31%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -146.45%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
84.18%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -16.67%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
98.32%
Growth well above LSCC's 91.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
129.62%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -545.81%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x LSCC's 50.00%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
9.88%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -38.93%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-23.65%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.