PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.86%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -239.77%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.75%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -18.51%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
103.23%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. LSCC's 29225.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
5.71%
SBC growth while LSCC is negative at -50.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
132.91%
Well above LSCC's 127.95% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
44.89%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -21.65%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
40.21%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. LSCC's 423.39%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
111.76%
Lower AP growth vs. LSCC's 252.78%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
306.80%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -2.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
17.65%
Well above LSCC's 8.68%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
64.21%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 189.83%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-31.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -22.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-5.50%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-5975.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -16.78%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-130.45%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 58.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 198.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-16.61%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.