PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.08%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -202.11%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.47%
D&A growth well above LSCC's 2.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
55.77%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -113.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-8.70%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 38.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
104.98%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 398.45%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
1211.76%
AR growth well above LSCC's 1507.63%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-288.46%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 10.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-125.49%
Negative yoy AP while LSCC is 314.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
13.87%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. LSCC's 92.46%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
1150.00%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -50.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
1.85%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 181.45%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
12.70%
CapEx growth well above LSCC's 1.20%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-12.70%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
89.25%
Purchases growth of 89.25% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
26.12%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -100.72%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
15.36%
We have some outflow growth while LSCC is negative at -94.66%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
185.12%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -141.07%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -94.28%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-67.42%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.