PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.78%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 204.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.61%
Less D&A growth vs. LSCC's 16.07%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
117.39%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. LSCC's 754.17%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
45.24%
SBC growth while LSCC is negative at -1.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-174.23%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -102.12%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-161.64%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -64.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
185.15%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 145.17%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-415.38%
Both negative yoy AP, with LSCC at -97.17%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-169.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -2565.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
19.05%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. LSCC's 75.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-48.39%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -29.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
22.29%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -15.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
55.26%
Purchases growth of 55.26% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-26.77%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 53738.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
96.62%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 43877.78%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-22.06%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 215.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-48.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -69.29%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
297.37%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. LSCC's 868.96%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
42.66%
Buyback growth of 42.66% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.