PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.23%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 15.54%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.49%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -33.67%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
675.00%
Some yoy growth while LSCC is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
9.84%
SBC growth well above LSCC's 7.68%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
139.52%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 3742.41%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
109.01%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. LSCC's 235.22%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-39.53%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 460.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
61.19%
Lower AP growth vs. LSCC's 1004.24%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
154.92%
Growth well above LSCC's 46.01%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-320.00%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 863.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
62.24%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 105.62%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-13.15%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 24.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.40%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-87.37%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-1890.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -145.44%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-121.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -249.59%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while LSCC is negative at -834.54%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-3.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -82.89%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
25.09%
Buyback growth of 25.09% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.