PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.91%
Negative net income growth while LSCC stands at 3.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.09%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 1.72%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
1350.00%
Deferred tax of 1350.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-14.58%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -2.04%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
62.22%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 193.26%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
248.05%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -83.27%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Negative yoy AP while LSCC is 326.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
8.75%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. LSCC's 644.85%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-195.65%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -30.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-11.95%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 114.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-9.40%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -18.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
9.40%
Acquisition growth of 9.40% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-109.94%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
38.64%
Liquidation growth of 38.64% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-5.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -79.52%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-110.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -42.43%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -53.85%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-7.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.