PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.72%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -41.61%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
53.66%
SBC growth well above LSCC's 56.87%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-247.40%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -150.13%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-190.30%
AR is negative yoy while LSCC is 78.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-105.13%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 28.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
303.45%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -98.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-505.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -155.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-190.91%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 22.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-51.48%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -46.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.23%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -0.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
68.79%
Purchases growth of 68.79% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
437.05%
Liquidation growth of 437.05% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
96.79%
Growth well above LSCC's 28.03%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
143.00%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 13.93%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
0.13%
Debt repayment well below LSCC's 56.25%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
204.17%
Stock issuance far above LSCC's 139.88%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-235.58%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.