PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.55%
Net income growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 30.15%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-0.40%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LSCC at -27.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
11.76%
Deferred tax of 11.76% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
9.52%
Less SBC growth vs. LSCC's 26.17%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
106.69%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -158.30%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
157.85%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -403.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-6550.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -184.80%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
23.73%
Lower AP growth vs. LSCC's 3805.38%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
87.54%
Growth well above LSCC's 174.99%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
125.00%
Well above LSCC's 7.02%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
102.12%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -25.31%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
19.25%
CapEx growth well above LSCC's 23.40%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.46%
Purchases growth of 61.46% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
10.50%
Liquidation growth of 10.50% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-2380.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 33.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
73.97%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 27.54%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
33.24%
We repay more while LSCC is negative at -400.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-40.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -8.57%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
46.25%
Buyback growth of 46.25% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.