PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.76%
Net income growth similar to LSCC's 26.83%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-2.80%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 1.21%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
56.86%
Deferred tax of 56.86% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-16.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -3.28%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
238.74%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -748.64%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
89.81%
AR growth while LSCC is negative at -41.69%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
82.81%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 5.82%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
123.08%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -458.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
742.31%
Growth well above LSCC's 216.75%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-384.38%
Both negative yoy, with LSCC at -6.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
47.26%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -29.18%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-45.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 20.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
45.21%
Acquisition growth of 45.21% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
7.44%
Purchases growth of 7.44% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
211.18%
Liquidation growth of 211.18% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-45.91%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 14.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
54.50%
Investing outflow well above LSCC's 18.14%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.32%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 13.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.