PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.85%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 17.66%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-0.82%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
136.36%
Deferred tax of 136.36% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
45.24%
SBC growth well above LSCC's 3.06%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-179.62%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 30.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-672.73%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -177.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-44.44%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 200.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
2200.00%
AP growth well above LSCC's 99.22%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-204.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -227.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
97.80%
Well above LSCC's 16.52%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-12.94%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 29.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-45.28%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 45.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-18.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
26.02%
Liquidation growth of 26.02% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
91.81%
We have some outflow growth while LSCC is negative at -61.10%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-11.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -2.10%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-10.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while LSCC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
71.93%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -62.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-566.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -0.09%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.