205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.15%
Net income growth at 50-75% of LSCC's 16.08%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
2.49%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -0.73%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-112.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
13.11%
SBC growth well above LSCC's 14.02%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
67.77%
Well above LSCC's 100.17% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
95.88%
AR growth well above LSCC's 98.02%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-38.46%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -219.15%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-124.64%
Negative yoy AP while LSCC is 4960.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
52.00%
Growth well above LSCC's 86.15%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-2750.00%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 1.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
14.65%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of LSCC's 40.73%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-25.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -147.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.83%
Purchases growth of 29.83% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
22.75%
Liquidation growth of 22.75% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-1878.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -8.67%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
111.45%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -49.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-72.45%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 155.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-46.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -67.38%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.