PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 22.44%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.43%
D&A growth well above LSCC's 3.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1300.00%
Deferred tax of 1300.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-27.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with LSCC at -14.01%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
336.76%
Less working capital growth vs. LSCC's 4438.46%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-785.71%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -6401.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-132.50%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 91.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
305.88%
A yoy AP increase while LSCC is negative at -74.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
339.29%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. LSCC's 1026.76%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
108.77%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -0.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
14.47%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 9.74%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-25.91%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 13.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
25.91%
Acquisition growth of 25.91% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
13.27%
Purchases growth of 13.27% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-46.44%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-34.57%
We reduce yoy other investing while LSCC is 4.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-796.06%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 9.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.89%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -54.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
4.79%
Buyback growth below 50% of LSCC's 40.21%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.