PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.81%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 6.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-15.81%
Negative yoy D&A while LSCC is 8.39%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-133.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.19%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 140.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
22.58%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. LSCC's 135.91%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-261.54%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -185.80%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-254.29%
Both negative yoy AP, with LSCC at -194.79%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-49.25%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -78.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
40.00%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -25.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-2.92%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 13.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-163.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -0.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-86.01%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-118.37%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
105.93%
Liquidation growth of 105.93% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
94.86%
Growth well above LSCC's 26.26%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-152.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -1147.77%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
63.21%
Debt repayment growth of 63.21% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-30.67%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 177.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-2.16%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.