PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.95%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 26.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.47%
Less D&A growth vs. LSCC's 8.94%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
75.00%
Deferred tax of 75.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
48.00%
SBC growth well above LSCC's 1.98%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-572.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -1220.13%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-95.83%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with LSCC at -206.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-219.15%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -180.66%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
120.37%
Lower AP growth vs. LSCC's 322.90%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-181.37%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -855.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-500.00%
Negative yoy while LSCC is 37.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.04%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -16.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
65.44%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -62.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-97.06%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-7.87%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
2.44%
Liquidation growth of 2.44% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
50.00%
We have some outflow growth while LSCC is negative at -16.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
25.17%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 90.25%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
9.62%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -83.25%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-314.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -0.01%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.